I'm amazed that a Jury convicted this guy, and the Judge actually thought there wasn't enough evidence to convict.
VISTA: Cameraman convicted of obstructing police : Vista:
I think US Citizens have the right to take photos/video of any police action. The police now have cameras on us--but why can't we video them? Yes, I do understand that the police need our respect and patience when there is a crisis or an "action" underway. They are often confronted with large crowds of bystanders, who can be more of a problem than the situation they have been called for.
It would have been nice to have a video of what actually happened in this case. Was the photographer really in the way of the police? Did they really think the photographer was going to detonate a bomb with his cell phone? I get the impression that the police just do not want photographers around them, and I think they really wanted to harass this particular one.
I hope they do appeal, and I hope they overturn the conviction -- even though there really is no "sentence" -- I think there is an important principle involved.
My thoughts on recent articles concerning issues of justice and fair play in the United States
Friday, May 18, 2012
Friday, May 4, 2012
The Decline of Violence: Scientific American
It appears that many in the world feel that violence has been increasing and that we are much more unsafe today than people were 50, 100 or 500 years ago. According to this article in Scientific American, that isn't true.
The Decline of Violence: Scientific American:
I think part of the reason for the public opinion of increasing violence, is that we are more aware of the violence that does occur, because of the tremendous improvement in international news reporting, with video and graphic detail. Many of the occurrences of violence would probably have never even been discovered, let alone reported in previous decades or centuries. Family violence, for example, happened, but was accepted, and nobody seemed concerned about it.
Also, I think there are "vested interests" in publicizing the violence that occurs. The news industry has found that reporting of violent acts increases readers/listeners/viewers, and thus revenue. The police, judicial, and military industries and their associated lobbies would like to keep the awareness up so they can increase their budgets, numbers of personnel, and/or sell more tools or weapons.
The Decline of Violence: Scientific American:
I think part of the reason for the public opinion of increasing violence, is that we are more aware of the violence that does occur, because of the tremendous improvement in international news reporting, with video and graphic detail. Many of the occurrences of violence would probably have never even been discovered, let alone reported in previous decades or centuries. Family violence, for example, happened, but was accepted, and nobody seemed concerned about it.
Also, I think there are "vested interests" in publicizing the violence that occurs. The news industry has found that reporting of violent acts increases readers/listeners/viewers, and thus revenue. The police, judicial, and military industries and their associated lobbies would like to keep the awareness up so they can increase their budgets, numbers of personnel, and/or sell more tools or weapons.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)