The Decline of Violence: Scientific American

It appears that many in the world feel that violence has been increasing and that we are much more unsafe today than people were 50, 100 or 500 years ago.  According to this article in Scientific American, that isn't true.

The Decline of Violence: Scientific American:

I think part of the reason for the public opinion of increasing violence, is that we are more aware of the violence that does occur, because of the tremendous improvement in international news reporting, with video and graphic detail.  Many of the occurrences of violence would probably have never even been discovered, let alone reported in previous decades or centuries.  Family violence, for example, happened, but was accepted, and nobody seemed concerned about it.

Also, I think there are "vested interests" in publicizing the violence that occurs.  The news industry has found that reporting of violent acts increases readers/listeners/viewers, and thus revenue.  The police, judicial, and military industries and their associated lobbies would like to keep the awareness up so they can increase their budgets, numbers of personnel, and/or sell more tools or weapons.

‘Cruel and unusual punishment,’ then and now - BostonHerald.com

I generally do NOT agree with anything that George Will writes.  I'm amazed that he has expressed concern about prosecuting children as adults.
‘Cruel and unusual punishment,’ then and now - BostonHerald.com:
I also hope the Supreme Court agrees that we should not punish children the same as adults.  Judges need to be permitted to use judgment...that's their job!

GREENHUT: Are we sliding toward a police state?

It is pretty clear that freedoms in the US are being eroded.  The war on drugs and supposed war on terrorism has accelerated the loss of rights and freedoms.  It is interesting that many writers and columnists are noticing it also.  Greenhut wrote a very good editorial in today's North County Times.
GREENHUT: Are we sliding toward a police state?

This article, also in today's newspaper describes how police arrested a 6 yr old little girl in her classroom for "throwing a tantrum"...http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57415156-504083/six-year-old-girl-handcuffed-and-arrested-for-throwing-tantrum-at-georgia-elementary-school/
Here is the youtube news report: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAAcsy4-Jjk

I can sympathize with the police -- they have legitimate concerns for their own life and safety when encountering unstable people.  I can also sympathize with teachers who have concerns about their own safety and the safety of other classmates when a student is completely out of control in a classroom.  However there must be some other way for our soc

Criminal Code Is Overgrown, Legal Experts Tell Panel - WSJ.com

We need a full and complete overhaul of the US Criminal Code.  Here is another example
Criminal Code Is Overgrown, Legal Experts Tell Panel - WSJ.com:

SAFE California initiative can eliminate the death penalty mess - latimes.com

I think I voted for this in 1977 --because it was supposed to streamline the death penalty process. But I'm not sure how I voted.

SAFE California initiative can eliminate the death penalty mess - latimes.com:

It is now interesting that Briggs now admits it didn't work. I do like the life sentence now.

'via Blog this'

ESCONDIDO: Men whose car window was broken at checkpoint found guilty of resisting officer

It is clear that Escondido's new law against "Driving while Hispanic" will need to be tested in higher courts before it becomes a legal law. These two men apparently are attempting to test that law.

ESCONDIDO: Men whose car window was broken at checkpoint found guilty of resisting officer:

Are all Americans required to put their window down all the way when stopped by a police officer? Or is it resisting arrest to not do so? On our car, the driver's window didn't work for many years. Would we be accused of resisting arrest? Would the police break our window. I assume the police wouldn't pay to repair a window they broke either.

In this Escondido situation, the police aren't trying to find DUIs, Smugglers, or other violations -- they are only trying to find illegal immigrants to harass. Is that a crime worthy of further eroding our rights as citizens?

The requirement to open a window to avoid a charge of resisting arrest is a "slippery slope." Do we have to open our car door? Do we have to open our trunk? Do we have to show them the contents of our cell phone, ipod, laptop? Do we have to submit to a strip search?

It isn't clear to me that our law enforcers -- to include police, prosecutors, and judges, are using common sense.

Guantanamo's rule: Once a 'terrorist,' always a terrorist - chicagotribune.com

The US has always been a "beacon" of justice, and has shown the world how to treat people suspected of crimes fairly. We have acted as a yardstick for other countries to measure their justice system against. However over the past 50 or 60 years our justice system has gradually eroded. This editorial I found in the Jan 11 2012 LA Times points out how absurd our policy towards the Guantanamo Bay detainees has been. They've been there for 10 years! The right-wingers continually claim that the ones we have let go are now back at work as terrorists --and, of course, people believe those statement. Even though, there is no solid information--or even a system for collecting such information.

Guantanamo's rule: Once a 'terrorist,' always a terrorist - chicagotribune.com
:

I think our country could do a lot better! And we could do it at a lot less cost to the taxpayer!