Saturday, December 31, 2011

Federal Offenses: Sewage Blunder Earns Building Engineer a Criminal Record - WSJ.com

This is another outrageous situation!  A Federal Government employee gets convicted of a crime of mis-routing sewage.  

Federal Offenses: Sewage Blunder Earns Building Engineer a Criminal Record - WSJ.com:

As a Government employee, I always thought that an employee could only be found guilty of a crime if it was "gross negligence" or intentionally committing a known crime.  The agency, or Government organization would be responsible for damages and financial penalties, if any.  In this case, the employee was not a licensed engineer.  He performed his act in good faith, yet was still given a criminal charge and record.

A follow-up article in WSJ on December 14th mentioned that Lawrence Lewis's lawyer, Barry Boss, may seek a presidential pardon -- I think Mr. Lewis deserves one!



A Sewage Blunder Earns Engineer a Criminal Record


There are more than 4,500 federal laws and regulations on the books. Lawrence Lewis was ensnared in one of them and now has a criminal record to show for it. All for a mistake he didn't even know he made. WSJ's Neil Hickey reports from Washington.
BOWIE, Md.—Lawrence Lewis was raised in the projects of Washington, D.C. By the time he was 20, all three of his older brothers had been murdered and his father was dead of a heart attack.
[LEWIS]Melissa Golden for The Wall Street Journal
Lawrence Lewis: 'I got a criminal record from my job—when I thought I was doing the right thing?'
Seeking an escape, he took night classes while working as a janitor for the D.C. school system. He rose to become chief engineer at a military retirement home. He raised his two youngest daughters alone, determined to show them how to lead a crime-free life.
That goal was derailed by blocked toilets.
In 2007, Mr. Lewis and his staff diverted a backed-up sewage system into an outside storm drain—one they long believed was connected to the city's sewage-treatment system—to prevent flooding in an area where the sickest residents lived. In fact, the storm drain emptied into a creek that ultimately reaches the Potomac River.
Eight months later, Mr. Lewis pleaded guilty in federal court to violating the Clean Water Act. He was given one year's probation and placed under court-ordered supervision.
"I got a criminal record from my job—when I thought I was doing the right thing?" says Mr. Lewis, 60 years old.

Growth in Federal Criminal Sentences

Mr. Lewis was caught in Washington's four-decade expansion of federal criminal law. Today, there are an estimated 4,500 federal crimes on the books, a significant increase from the three in the Constitution (treason, piracy and counterfeiting). There is an additional, and much larger, number of regulations written to enforce the laws. One of those regulations ensnared Mr. Lewis.
Many of these federal infractions are now easier to prosecute than in the past because of a weakening in a bedrock doctrine of Anglo-American jurisprudence: the principle of mens rea, or "guilty mind," which holds that a person shouldn't be convicted if he hasn't shown an intent to do something wrong. A law without a mens rea requirement tripped up Mr. Lewis.

Nobody, including Mr. Lewis, argues that dumping waste into a creek is a good idea. However, critics of the federal criminal justice system argue the government is criminalizing mistakes that might more appropriately be handled with civil fines or injunctions. In Mr. Lewis's case, a Justice Department court filing acknowledged he didn't realize the waste was going into the creek.

In fact, the building's manager and Mr. Lewis's then-supervisor, retired Navy Capt. Craig Sackett, says it was long standard practice at the home—predating Mr. Lewis's tenure—to divert overflow into nearby storm drains if a backup occurred. This prevented floods within the building itself. Like Mr. Lewis, Mr. Sackett says he thought the flow was going into the district's waste-treatment system.

He says he doesn't know why Mr. Lewis was the one prosecuted. "It was either him or me," Mr. Sackett says, "and they certainly talked to me."

Mr. Lewis was one of 788,517 people sentenced for federal crimes between 2000 and 2010. Most were hit with felonies, such as fraud or drug dealing, which can carry prison sentences reaching into the decades.

788,517

The number of people sentenced for federal crimes between 2000 and 2010

Tens of thousands were found guilty of misdemeanors, which typically carry jail terms of up to a year. Though less serious than felonies, the possible impact of a misdemeanor conviction on getting a job or a loan or other aspects of everyday life "can be quite grave," says Prof. Robert Boruchowitz of Seattle University law school, who has studied the issue.

"You have a large community of people who are not considered criminals in the traditional sense," living with the consequences "for the rest of their lives," says Lisa Wayne, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Applications for jobs, loans and occupational licenses—ranging from auctioneers to plumbers—ask about a person's criminal history. While a conviction is rarely an automatic disqualification, it can often tip the balance against an applicant, observers say.

A misdemeanor conviction can restrict international travel and make joining the military harder. It "can be disqualifying" for anyone seeking federal employment, "though the decision is made on a case-by-case basis depending upon a number of factors," says Angela Bailey of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
[LEWIS]

As a teen, Mr. Lewis says, he was arrested for assault after getting into a fight, but was found not guilty. Bad tempers are a family inheritance, he says.

In 1969 his brother Warren was shot to death. His brother Nathan Jr. was gunned down in 1971. His father, Nathan Sr., had a fatal heart attack when told of his namesake's death. His third brother, Roy, was stabbed to death weeks later while in prison on an assault charge.

At first, Mr. Lewis was fatalistic. "We had the same life. We came out of the same womb. Why was I different? When was my time coming?" he recalls thinking.

To escape from the world that took his family, he started work as a janitor for the D.C. Education Department earning $1.80 an hour. He began taking facilities-management classes at night and learning about power plants, boiler rooms and maintenance. By the time he left the Board of Education in 1993, after 24 years, he had risen to Facility Manager, making nearly $50,000 a year.

Eventually he moved on to the Knollwood military retirement center, a sprawling network of living facilities housing 300 veterans, their spouses and survivors on 16 acres in northwest Washington.

Sanford Morgan, Knollwood's engineer before Mr. Lewis, says sewage was a recurring problem. According to court documents, blockages were usually caused by elderly residents flushing adult diapers down the toilets. The backup would clog the pump that normally pushed waste to the appropriate disposal system.
Melissa Golden for The Wall Street Journal
Sewage went into Rock Creek, which feeds the Potomac.

"I made many attempts to correct it," says Mr. Morgan, who has known Mr. Lewis for more than 20 years and calls him "a straight-up guy."

At 7:30 a.m. on March 29, 2007, Mr. Lewis and his employees hooked up a hose to deal with the latest problem. They pumped sewage into the storm drain until 2:30 p.m., stopping only when authorities began arriving. A jogger in nearby Rock Creek Park had noticed the usually clear creek water was murky. The Park Police traced the source to Knollwood.

Mr. Sackett was at Arlington National Cemetery interring his father-in-law when he got the call. He recalled more emergency vehicles at Knollwood "than I'd seen in my entire life."

Rock Creek is a small tributary that flows from Maryland through Washington, D.C., and into the Potomac River. For most of its 12 miles, it isn't possible to put a boat into the water.

For decades, federal law only covered waters deemed navigable under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Over the years, it became waters that could be made navigable. In 1972 the Clean Water Act further broadened the law, as Congress became concerned about pollution and water quality, spurred by high-profile incidents such as the Cuyahoga River catching fire in 1969.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which had the job of writing regulations to enforce the 1972 law, expanded the "waters of the United States" definition to include tributaries such as Rock Creek. The argument was that pollution can move downstream to larger bodies of water, says David M. Uhlmann, director of the Environmental Law and Policy Program at the University of Michigan Law School.

Spurred by the 2007 raid, Knollwood solved its backup problem by cutting a new manhole and clearing a buildup of lime, grease and sludge. Mr. Lewis voluntarily attended EPA classes to learn more about procedures and regulations.

Mr. Lewis initially wanted to go to trial and fight the charges against him. He says he had served on many juries over the years and felt his peers would understand the difference between a criminal act, and a well-intentioned but mistaken act.

"I said, to hell with pleading guilty, I'm innocent," Mr. Lewis recalls.

But Mr. Lewis's lawyer, Barry Boss, told him his argument would be tough to make. (Knollwood paid for Mr. Boss to represent Mr. Lewis.)

In an interview, Mr. Boss said, "There was no fight to have. It was a strict liability case," meaning the government didn't have to prove Mr. Lewis knew he was doing anything wrong. "His good intentions did not matter." The lawyer told Mr. Lewis that, to be found guilty, prosecutors needed only to prove that he was aware that sewage was being pumped into the storm drain that led to the creek.

In court documents, the government argued that Mr. Lewis didn't ensure the storm drain fed into a waste-treatment facility rather than the creek. About 30% of the city's storm drains flow to a treatment plant, according to the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority. Plus, the government argued, Mr. Lewis was responsible for several prior discharges during his time at Knollwood.

Mr. Lewis decided to plead guilty, fearful he would lose his house if he fought the charge. He has legal custody of his two youngest children (he has four others). His mother, Nancy Lewis, 96, also lives with him.

He entered a guilty plea in December 2007. Prosecutors agreed probation and a $2,500 fine would be sufficient penalty.

The U.S. Attorney's Office declined to comment on Mr. Lewis's case or on whether it considered charging other individuals.

As the family drove to the courthouse for his sentencing, Mr. Lewis told his daughter Ijananya, then 16, she might have to drive home if he ended the day in prison.

A few weeks later, Mr. Boss, Mr. Lewis's attorney, took his client to the probation office for the first time and recalls him crestfallen. "He was telling me how he'd spent his adult life trying to show his daughters that not every African-American man is caught up in the criminal-justice system." Mr. Lewis says he regularly brings his children to the graveyard where his brothers are buried, or back to the projects, to show them the consequences of bad choices.

Bitter over his conviction, he left Knollwood. He filled out several job applications, all of which asked if he had ever been arrested or convicted. None of the potential employers ever called, he says.

Two months into his job search he filled out an application for a job at Gallaudet University in Washington. It asked if he had a felony record or a misdemeanor conviction that required imprisonment—a question that allowed him to answer "no." He got hired.

He didn't volunteer any information about his guilty plea to his new employers. But his probation officers put him in an awkward position, Mr. Lewis says, by making regular spot checks at the university.

In one instance, Mr. Lewis's supervisor at Gallaudet noticed the officers and asked Mr. Lewis what they wanted. "I told him it was somebody I knew who had just stopped by to check on me," Mr. Lewis says.

The next time the probation officers came by, "I tried to explain it could create problems for me," Mr. Lewis says. "They were nice about it, but they said, 'We have to keep coming.'"

The probation office referred questions to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, which wouldn't comment on Mr. Lewis's case.

Meloyde Batten-Mickens, executive director of facilities at Gallaudet, says Mr. Lewis had mentioned he had been in trouble, but didn't provide specifics until more recently, when he told her the full story. Knowing about his prior conviction makes no difference, Ms. Batten-Mickens says. "I trust him across the board."

On probation, Mr. Lewis had to fill out monthly cash-flow statements showing his salary and spending to prove he wasn't involved in any unusual activities. He had to hand over his .357-caliber revolver to a family member for the duration of his probation.

He also temporarily lost privacy protections, as he learned when probation officers made an unannounced 6 a.m. search of his home. They would tell him only that he'd had an unauthorized contact with police, a potential probation violation. Mr. Lewis says he assumes the officers were referring to a traffic stop he had recently been involved in—a stop that didn't produce a traffic ticket.

After searching his home for a couple of hours the officers left and never took any further action. "They went through everything," Mr. Lewis says. "You'd have thought I had killed somebody."

Today, Mr. Lewis's life is moving back to normal. He has a second job at the power plant run by the University of the District of Columbia, where he was hired after coming off probation.

For his family, the episode has left a strong impression. Mr. Lewis's youngest daughter Shirley, 16, a high-school junior with a 3.8 grade-point average, says her father's conviction and the circumstances surrounding it have "given me a firsthand look at what the world is like."

Mr. Lewis says his lowest point came around the time of his conviction when he went to the courthouse to be fingerprinted and have his mug shot taken.

"I was treated like everybody else, like I was a hardened criminal" he says. "Imagine what I looked like. 'What you in for? Backed up toilets.'"

Monday, November 14, 2011

Feds Shift Defense of Cellphone Tracking - WSJ.com

This article in the November 3rd WSJ explains that the FBI is now backing off on the warrant requirement for use of tracking devices. The only reason they are doing it is to avoid explaining their technology capabilities -- which they are treating as classified.

Feds Shift Defense of Cellphone Tracking - WSJ.com:

'via Blog this'

I suspect that the capabilities are really a lot more than reported, given the already amazing capabilities of smart phones. However since it could be easily defeated, the techniques and capabilities should be kept from the "bad guys" as long as possible.

Monday, November 7, 2011

Lauren Abramson | Solutions

This lady, Lauren Abramson, has hit upon a seemingly good solution to our youth crime problem. See this article which was in the Sept 19, 2011 Newsweek.
Lauren Abramson | Solutions:

'via Blog this'

Friday, November 4, 2011

FBI's 'Stingray' Cellphone Tracker Stirs a Fight Over Search Warrants, Fourth Amendment - WSJ.com

On November 8th, the Supreme Court will hear arguments over whether or not police need a warrent before secretly installing a GPS device on a suspects car.
See this Wall Street Journal Article
FBI's 'Stingray' Cellphone Tracker Stirs a Fight Over Search Warrants, Fourth Amendment - WSJ.com
This is an interesting case because it involves new technology, and a clash between needs of law enforcement to use the new technology and protection of individual's privacy without probably cause.
Apparently Harris Corp makes the devices that the police use. I'm sure the technology in this article is already obsolete, since smart phones now have much more sophisticated technology that can provide more detailed information. The decision from this case could allow a lot more than just geolocating where a person is -- it could also allow listening and tapping in to a smartphone's camera. Even tapping into "On-Star" like devices in cars.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Micheal Flaherty: The Latest Crime Wave—Sending Your Child to a Better School - WSJ.com

This is really hard to believe that it could happen in America! People arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced for switching public schools. Outrageous!

Micheal Flaherty: The Latest Crime Wave—Sending Your Child to a Better School - WSJ.com:

Monday, October 24, 2011

'Mens Rea' Legal Protection Erodes in U.S. as Federal Criminal Code Expands - WSJ.com

I think this is a serious threat to our freedom. Our list of laws that identify crimes continues to grow at Federal and State levels, and they are now so complex that it is difficult for anyone to know what is a crime and what isn't. At the same time, it appears that citizens can be convicted of crimes even when there was no way that they could know they were doing anything wrong --sounds a lot like 1984

'Mens Rea' Legal Protection Erodes in U.S. as Federal Criminal Code Expands - WSJ.com:
'

'Mens Rea' Legal Protection Erodes in U.S. as Federal Criminal Code Expands - WSJ.com

I think this is a serious threat to our freedom. Our list of laws that identify crimes continues to grow at Federal and State levels, and they are now so complex that it is difficult for anyone to know what is a crime and what isn't. At the same time, it appears that citizens can be convicted of crimes even when there was no way that they could know they were doing anything wrong --sounds a lot like 1984

'Mens Rea' Legal Protection Erodes in U.S. as Federal Criminal Code Expands - WSJ.com:
'

Sunday, September 18, 2011

How not to catch a terrorist - latimes.com

Using expensive, elaborate incentives to trap potential terrorists is another example of how our system of justice in the US has gotten out of control.
How not to catch a terrorist - latimes.com

I think these law enforcement agencies are doing this to help justify their existence and protect their jobs. It is a very fine line to walk for the law enforcement agencies, and very difficult to stay "on course" without clear guidelines and empowered managers blessed with common sense.

I also think that the same thing is going on in the drug enforcement area.

Friday, August 19, 2011

'West Memphis 3' May Be Freed in Plea Deal - WSJ.com

This appears to be a bizzare situation --'West Memphis 3' May Be Freed in Plea Deal - WSJ.com
If the DNA evidence shows that they are innocent, why not let them free?

Sunday, August 7, 2011

Immigration Processing at LAX

Tourism is big business, travel is a huge business, and these combined businesses employ a lot of people and bring in tremendous tax revenue and foreign exchange to help offset our balance of payments.
Homeland Security and immigration/customs control is also important to our country. However it appears to me that we have been unwilling to spend adequate resources to make our immigration check points --particularly at airports--friendly. I believe that to a person entering the country that they would feel like they are going into a prison. Long, sterile hallways ending up with very long lines --and signs forbidding the use of cell phones during the long, painful wait in line. It isn't friendly, and it is very intimidating to visitors to our country. I also think it is almost an insult to American citizens to be treated this way when they return from overseas.

All travelers are now paying a steep additional security tax to cover the costs of the additional security. I believe that just a small investment and a few changes would dramatically improve these checkpoints and help improve our face to the rest of the world, and treat our citizens better. For foreign visitors, this is their first "taste" of America -- we should try our best to make it reasonably comfortable!

Here are my suggestions:
1. Improve the processing speed through immigration--shorten the wait in lines! I understand queuing theory and know how difficult it is to schedule employees and processing stations for a totally random volume of arrival of passengers. However the INS is in the position of knowing far in advance of exactly how many people are going to arrive, and probably even knows how many are US citizens vs foreigners. Passenger manifests are available far in advance. With this knowledge at their fingertips, why doesn't INS schedule adequate staff to handle all stations during the peak periods? At a grocery store, if a queue get's too long, the store may lose business. However since everyone must go through the immigration checkpoint, there is no "cost" to INS to let the lines get unreasonably long. Since everyone must be processed, the long line simply serves as a "buffer" to the processing.
2. Improve the "ambiance" of the waiting area: The appearance of the hallways and waiting room is really sad! The line is unnecessarily compressed into the "snake" configuration and could be spread out over the whole facility--with lines going back into the hallway. Signage in the area is also limited, doesn't cover all languages. Why not have large TV monitors that display the instructions in every possible written language so arriving passengers can read them while standing in lines?
3. Allow use of cell phones in line! Yes, I agree it is annoying to have people on cell phones talking while in line. It is also annoying and impolite to be using a phone while being processed. Why not just forbid cell phones beyond some point in the lines--a minute or so prior to being processed? People have just arrived and need to confirm ground transportation, connect with their hosts etc. This is a perfect time for arriving passengers to do that. We should make it convenient, and do whatever is necessary to make sure cell phone reception is good in the waiting area.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Courts nationwide hold hearings with video - BusinessWeek

This article on Bloomberg today points out that video conferencing is being used more and more for judicial hearings, and it is saving lots of money!

Courts nationwide hold hearings with video - BusinessWeek

Maybe this is a good trend and will increase confidence in the use of video for justice. It may also help lead us to true videotapeded jury trials.